In two weeks my vacation begins. Kids go back to school on Sept 7th. Hopefully I will then slowly recuperate from this idiocy disease which has stolen my mind and ability to function (of course I’m gonna blame the kids otherwise I’d have to actually admit that it was me and isn’t that the whole [...]
So, I’m watching this cute little guy strutting his stuff in s hot little jeans diaper. He’s got a swagger that’s got all the babes drooling. But, of course you’ve got to get those crabby old hags that just have to find fault with EVERYTHING. It’s just too much for those uptight grannies who sit home pouring over the tv and the internet searching for deviant causes to champion and sexual promiscuity to fight the complete loss of our societies degenerating morality – woo hoo!! My recommendation to these holier than thou crazy old biddies?
Bend over and pull dat stick outta yer ass!
Don’t get your panties in a bunch.
Get Laid – Quick
Get Drunk (then get laid)
Chill out!
The New York Times reports that several networks, including ABC, TNT, and E!, decided that the ad—titled “I’ve Got Chic in My Pants” (seriously!)—was inappropriate for them. That makes it the latest in a long line of commercials that, thanks to getting the corporate boot, receive more free publicity than any paid spot could ever deliver.
Now, everyone, check out this cute little stud and let me know what you think, too hot or just to f#@king cute?
Speaking of kids – Would you tag yours? I’ve been hearing more and more about parents implanting their sweet little kiddies with micro chips so I decided to read up on the prospect. My first thought is no way, I’d never do anything so invasive to my kid. But, after I thought about it for a while and think of all the kids this could have saved from all the sickos out there I have to think, maybe it would be the smart thing to do – but I’m still a long way off from deciding for or against. While reading up on this subject I came across some pretty funny accusations made by certain loony politicians concerning the right to implant people with this chip -
Concerns over privacy have aligned with apocalyptic Biblical prophecy in a proposed Virginia law that limits the use of microchip implants on humans because of a lawmaker’s concern that the chips will prove to be the Antichrist’s “mark of the beast.”
On Wednesday, Virginia’s House of Delegates passed a bill that forbids companies from forcing their employees to be implanted with tracking devices, a move likely to be applauded by civil libertarians.
But Virginia state Delegate Mark Cole’s reasons for proposing the law have as much to do with the Book of Revelation as they do with concerns over privacy in the digital age.
Cole says he is concerned that the implants will turn out to be the “mark of the beast” worn by Satan’s minions.
“My understanding — I’m not a theologian — but there’s a prophecy in the Bible that says you’ll have to receive a mark, or you can neither buy nor sell things in end times,” Cole said, as quoted at the Washington Post. “Some people think these computer chips might be that mark.”
I’m cracking up b/c I was literally just telling my husband about that commercial, so I was so glad to find your post so I didn’t have to go digging for the video!
Seriously? Someone complained about that commercial? Jeeze – those people need to get lives. And the thing about micro-chipping people – unbelievable on all levels – that someone would do it and that someone would protest on the grounds given. I have to read the front of the newspapers more often.
Really? People complained? That commercial is uber-cute! I saw this morning people were complaining about a 3 year old little girl making a spoof of Ga Ga’s telephone video – from the clips, I didn’t think it was bad. Who cares that she had a ton of make-up on? It’s not like she wears it every day (hopefully).
I don’t know about the chip thing… I mean – it’s good if it helps protect children from abductions, but they’ll still happen. Then I’m all – UFO/Sci-Fi about it with the “government watching us” and all… I don’t know – a bit too much for me.
Grace – “The New York Times reports that several networks, including ABC, TNT, and E!, decided that the ad—titled “I’ve Got Chic in My Pants” (seriously!)—was inappropriate for them. That makes it the latest in a long line of commercials that, thanks to getting the corporate boot, receive more free publicity than any paid spot could ever deliver. ”
Momma Drama – Cracks me up – the E Network banned this ad? This is the network that shows the Kardashians, Girls Next Door and tons of other stupid shows, unbelievable.
I saw this commercial for the first time on tv just the other day. I stopped what I was doing to watch it. Just tooo cute. I love the ” I poo in blue” hahahaha. I am going to buy Mighty Bugz a box of these. He’s too cute for regular ole diapers
Oh NO! I had to watch the commercial twice… it is GENIUS! That should sell a million diapers. It isn’t any different than those freaky talking baby ones if you ask me. I don’t think it is inappropriate, just funny. I poo in blue. Genius!
That commercial is adorable. I can’t imagine anyone being offended by it. So it’s okay to flaunt Victoria Secrets boob shots all over the tube but THIS is offensive. Freakin’ nuts!
Spicybugz – When my 20 yr old was a kid they had the blue pin-striped ones, so cute. Mighty bugzs will look gorgeous!
Katherine – I wish I pood in blue or pink
injaynesworld – It just cracks me up that the networks that won’t show it show some of the sluttiest shows on tv – “girls next door” “keeping up with the Kardashians” I can’t figure out what’s offensive about the commercial.
I saw this commercial earlier this week and thought it was just a riot!!! If anyone objects to it they are just wrapped to friggin tight. As far as the microchip mark of the devil nonsense…aren’t these the same people who want the “reckoning” to hurry up and get here?
Okay….people are way to sensitive to find anything sexual in that advertisement. Not to mention that it’s one of the more impressive diaper ads I’ve ever seen.
As for the tagging, it may be invasive but the Mark of the Beast? That’s just laughable. An invasion of privacy, possibly, but that’s about as far as it goes.
Apparently I am completely out of it because I couldn’t find anything offensive in the commercial. A microchip is the mark of the devil? Does that make Google the antiChrist?
The commercial is really cute and clever. I can’t believe people get upset about it, wait, yes I can. What do they expect? Diapers don’t really change, you can only improve them so much, they have to come up with something new. Cute kid too.
As for tagging kids with the chip, I don’t know, it might save a few kids but probably won’t have a huge impact. If they could be easily removed later I’d be more for it. They work great for dogs.
I think that commercial is WICKEDLY ADORABLE. What the heck are people so worked up about?
And, yes, I would TOTALLY implant a micro chip inside my child. I am forever a nervous wreck about pedophiles and kidnappers. I should probably stop watching so much Law & Order.
Jun 7, 2010 | Reply
I’m cracking up b/c I was literally just telling my husband about that commercial, so I was so glad to find your post so I didn’t have to go digging for the video!
Stopping by to welcome you to SITS!
Jun 8, 2010 | Reply
Seriously? Someone complained about that commercial? Jeeze – those people need to get lives. And the thing about micro-chipping people – unbelievable on all levels – that someone would do it and that someone would protest on the grounds given. I have to read the front of the newspapers more often.
Jun 8, 2010 | Reply
Really? People complained? That commercial is uber-cute! I saw this morning people were complaining about a 3 year old little girl making a spoof of Ga Ga’s telephone video – from the clips, I didn’t think it was bad. Who cares that she had a ton of make-up on? It’s not like she wears it every day (hopefully).
I don’t know about the chip thing… I mean – it’s good if it helps protect children from abductions, but they’ll still happen. Then I’m all – UFO/Sci-Fi about it with the “government watching us” and all… I don’t know – a bit too much for me.
Jun 8, 2010 | Reply
Shell – He’s so cute
Grace – “The New York Times reports that several networks, including ABC, TNT, and E!, decided that the ad—titled “I’ve Got Chic in My Pants” (seriously!)—was inappropriate for them. That makes it the latest in a long line of commercials that, thanks to getting the corporate boot, receive more free publicity than any paid spot could ever deliver. ”
Momma Drama – Cracks me up – the E Network banned this ad? This is the network that shows the Kardashians, Girls Next Door and tons of other stupid shows, unbelievable.
Jun 8, 2010 | Reply
I saw this commercial for the first time on tv just the other day. I stopped what I was doing to watch it. Just tooo cute. I love the ” I poo in blue” hahahaha. I am going to buy Mighty Bugz a box of these. He’s too cute for regular ole diapers
Jun 8, 2010 | Reply
Oh NO! I had to watch the commercial twice… it is GENIUS! That should sell a million diapers. It isn’t any different than those freaky talking baby ones if you ask me. I don’t think it is inappropriate, just funny. I poo in blue. Genius!
Jun 10, 2010 | Reply
That commercial is adorable. I can’t imagine anyone being offended by it. So it’s okay to flaunt Victoria Secrets boob shots all over the tube but THIS is offensive. Freakin’ nuts!
Jun 11, 2010 | Reply
Haha ‘the coolest you’ll look pooping your pants’
I like that commercial! Some people have nothing better to do than find something to complain about.
Jun 12, 2010 | Reply
Spicybugz – When my 20 yr old was a kid they had the blue pin-striped ones, so cute. Mighty bugzs will look gorgeous!
Katherine – I wish I pood in blue or pink
injaynesworld – It just cracks me up that the networks that won’t show it show some of the sluttiest shows on tv – “girls next door” “keeping up with the Kardashians” I can’t figure out what’s offensive about the commercial.
cashier – Political correctness gone awry
Jun 12, 2010 | Reply
I saw this commercial earlier this week and thought it was just a riot!!! If anyone objects to it they are just wrapped to friggin tight. As far as the microchip mark of the devil nonsense…aren’t these the same people who want the “reckoning” to hurry up and get here?
Jun 12, 2010 | Reply
Okay….people are way to sensitive to find anything sexual in that advertisement. Not to mention that it’s one of the more impressive diaper ads I’ve ever seen.
As for the tagging, it may be invasive but the Mark of the Beast? That’s just laughable. An invasion of privacy, possibly, but that’s about as far as it goes.
Jun 14, 2010 | Reply
Apparently I am completely out of it because I couldn’t find anything offensive in the commercial. A microchip is the mark of the devil? Does that make Google the antiChrist?
Jun 14, 2010 | Reply
The commercial is really cute and clever. I can’t believe people get upset about it, wait, yes I can. What do they expect? Diapers don’t really change, you can only improve them so much, they have to come up with something new. Cute kid too.
As for tagging kids with the chip, I don’t know, it might save a few kids but probably won’t have a huge impact. If they could be easily removed later I’d be more for it. They work great for dogs.
Jun 14, 2010 | Reply
I think that commercial is WICKEDLY ADORABLE. What the heck are people so worked up about?
And, yes, I would TOTALLY implant a micro chip inside my child. I am forever a nervous wreck about pedophiles and kidnappers. I should probably stop watching so much Law & Order.
Jun 14, 2010 | Reply
So totally true…time to get a life ans simply enjoy it. So what to what others choose to do for excitement..life is so like that.
Find your niche and go with it……